2011 AIME I Problems/Problem 15
Contents
Problem
For some integer , the polynomial
has the three integer roots
,
, and
. Find
.
Solution 1
From Vieta's formulas, we know that , and
. Thus
. All three of
,
, and
are non-zero: say, if
, then
(which is not an integer).
, let
. If
, then
and if
, then
. We have
Thus
. We know that
,
have the same sign. So
.
Also, if we fix ,
is fixed, so
is maximized when
. Hence,
So
. Thus we have bounded
as
, i.e.
since
. Let's analyze
. Here is a table:
![]() | ![]() |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
We can tell we don't need to bother with ,
, So
won't work.
,
is not divisible by
,
, which is too small to get
.
,
is not divisible by
or
or
, we can clearly tell that
is too much.
Hence, ,
.
,
.
Answer:
Solution 2
Starting off like the previous solution, we know that , and
.
Therefore, .
Substituting, .
Factoring the perfect square, we get: or
.
Therefore, a sum () squared minus a product (
) gives
..
We can guess and check different ’s starting with
since
.
therefore
.
Since no factors of can sum to
(
being the largest sum), a + b cannot equal
.
making
.
and
so
cannot work either.
We can continue to do this until we reach .
making
.
, so one root is
and another is
. The roots sum to zero, so the last root must be
.
.
Solution 3
Let us first note the obvious that is derived from Vieta's formulas: . Now, due to the first equation, let us say that
, meaning that
and
. Now, since both
and
are greater than 0, their absolute values are both equal to
and
, respectively. Since
is less than 0, it equals
. Therefore,
, meaning
. We now apply Newton's sums to get that
,or
. Solving, we find that
satisfies this, meaning
, so
.
Solution 4
We have
As a result, we have
So,
As a result,
Solve and
, where
is an integer
Cause
So, after we tried for times, we get
and
then ,
As a result,
Solution 5 (mod to help bash)
First, derive the equations and
. Since the product is negative,
is negative, and
and
positive. Now, a simple mod 3 testing of all cases shows that
, and
has the repective value. We can choose
not congruent to 0, make sure you see why. Now, we bash on values of
, testing the quadratic function to see if
is positive. You can also use a delta argument like solution 4, but this is simpler. We get that for
,
. Choosing
positive we get
, so
~firebolt360
Solution 6
Note that , so
, or
. Also,
, so
. Substituting
, we can obtain
, or
. If it is not known that
is prime, it may be proved in
minutes or so by checking all primes up to
. If
divided either of
, then in order for
to contain an extra copy of
, both
would need to be divisible by
. But then
would also be divisible by
, and the sum
would clearly be divisible by
.
By LTE, if
is divisible by
and neither
are divisible by
. Thus, the only possibility remaining is if
did not divide
. Let
. Then, we have
. Rearranging gives
. As in the above solutions, we may eliminate certain values of
by using mods. Then, we may test values until we obtain
, and
. Thus,
,
, and our answer is
.
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNbfAu5rdJI&t=26s ~ MathEx
See also
2011 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 14 |
Followed by Last Problem | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.