1965 AHSME Problems/Problem 36
Problem
Given distinct straight lines and
. From a point in
a perpendicular is drawn to
;
from the foot of this perpendicular a line is drawn perpendicular to
.
From the foot of this second perpendicular a line is drawn perpendicular to
;
and so on indefinitely. The lengths of the first and second perpendiculars are
and
, respectively.
Then the sum of the lengths of the perpendiculars approaches a limit as the number of perpendiculars grows beyond all bounds. This limit is:
Solution 1
For simplicity, let the first perpendicular from to
be
, and let the second perpendicular have foot
on
. Further, let the perpendicular from
to
have foot
and length
, as in the diagram. Also, let
. From the problem, we have
and
. By AA similarity, we have
, so
as well. In
, we see that
, and, in
,
. Equating these two expressions for
, we get that
, or, because
,
. Thus,
is the geometric mean of
and
. Note that if we remove the first perpendicular (i.e. the one with length
), we are left with a smaller version of the original problem, which will have the same equation for the limit (but this time expressed in terms of
and
rather than
and
). Thus, if we let the length of the fourth perpendicular be
, then
will equal the geometric mean of
and
, and so on for the infinitude of perpendiculars. Thus, because the length of a given perpendicular (except the first one) is the geometric mean of the two adjacent perpendiculars, the lengths of the perpendiculars form a geometric sequence. Because the sequence's first two terms are
and
, it has common ratio
. Because
, the common ratio is positive and less than
, so the sequence's infinite geometric series converges. This infinite sum is given by
, which is answer choice
.
Solution 2 (Answer choices, intuition)
Let and
be measured with some units of length (say, meters). The limit of the sum of the lengths of the perpendiculars would, then, be measured in meters as well. Performing dimensional analysis on each of the answer choices, we can eliminate options (A) and (B), because they have units
, so they are dimensionless. Unfortunately, our other three options all have units of meters. Now, we have a
chance of guessing the answer correctly, but we can go further. Think of what happens as
approaches
. Then,
approaches
, and the perpendiculars have nearly no space to "bounce between" the two lines, and so they likely have zero total length. Likewise, if we think of what happens as
approaches
, all of the perpendiculars except the first one (with length
) go to zero. From this intuition, one would think that
would have a larger impact upon the total length of the perpendiculars. Out of the three answer choices left, this conjecture is only consistent with choice
. To reinforce this decision, think about what happens as
approaches
again. We would expect the sum to approach
and
to approach
. Plugging in
into the expression in choice (E), we get
, which is what we expected. On the other hand, options (C) and (D) equate to 0, which is clearly false.
See Also
1965 AHSC (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 35 |
Followed by Problem 37 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30 • 31 • 32 • 33 • 34 • 35 • 36 • 37 • 38 • 39 • 40 | ||
All AHSME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.